$isLighthouse = (int) isLighthouse();
DOWNLOAD

We'd Love to Hear from You

CAPTCHA

We'd Love to Hear from You

CAPTCHA

Rigid PCB Capability

SENTAK Rigid PCB Manufacturing Capabilities

Document Control: This document outlines the comprehensive manufacturing specifications and technical competencies of SENTAK for standard and advanced Rigid Printed Circuit Boards. All capabilities are subject to formal Design for Manufacturability (DFM) review. This document does not cover Flex or Rigid-Flex PCB capabilities.

Rigid Flex Capability
1.0 General Construction & Materials

Category

Standard Capability

Advanced / Specialized Capability

Notes & Standards

Layer Count

1 - 12 Layers

Up to 32 Layers

Prototype to high-volume production.

Standard Board Thickness

0.4 mm - 3.2 mm (0.016" - 0.126")

0.2 mm (Ultra-Thin) to 8.0 mm (Thick Core)

Final thickness tolerance typically ±10%.

Base Material

FR-4 (TG140, TG150, TG170), Halogen-Free FR-4

High-Tg (≥170°C), High-Frequency (Rogers, Taconic, Isola), High CTI (>600V), IGlass, Metal Core (Aluminum), Heavy Copper (≥3oz)

Full range of laminate and prepreg from leading suppliers (Shengyi, ITEQ, Isola, Rogers, etc.).

Copper Foil Weight (Finished)

1 oz (35µm) Inner/Outer, 2 oz (70µm) Outer

0.5 oz (18µm) to 10+ oz (350µm+)

Supports mixed copper weights within a board.

Maximum Panel Size

24" x 24" (610mm x 610mm)

26" x 30" (660mm x 760mm)

Standard panel for optimal yield and process control.

Minimum Single/Double Layer Core

0.05 mm (2 mil)

0.04 mm (1.6 mil)

For sequential lamination builds.

2.0 Mechanical & Dimensional Specifications

Parameter

Standard Capability

Advanced Capability

Notes

Board Outline Tolerance (CNC Routing)

±0.10 mm (±0.004")

±0.075 mm (±0.003")

For standard complexity profiles.

Board Flatness (Bow & Twist)

≤ 0.75% per IPC-6012

≤ 0.50%

For boards > 150mm.

Edge Roughness (After Routing)

Ra ≤ 3.2 µm (125 µin)

Ra ≤ 1.6 µm (63 µin) with post-processing

Standard routing. Smoother edges available.

Counterbore/Countersink

Supported

Depth control ±0.10 mm

For specific connector or mounting needs.

3.0 Drilling & Hole Formation

Parameter

Standard Capability

Advanced Capability

Notes

Mechanical Drill Size (Min)

0.15 mm (6 mil)

0.10 mm (4 mil)

Aspect Ratio up to 15:1.

Laser Drill Size (Microvia)

0.075 mm (3 mil)

0.050 mm (2 mil)

CO2/UV Laser for HDI. Aspect Ratio (1:1 max for capture pad).

Aspect Ratio (Mechanical Drilling)

10:1

15:1

Hole depth vs. drill diameter.

Hole Registration Tolerance

±0.075 mm (±3 mil)

±0.050 mm (±2 mil)

Hole to pattern.

Non-Plated Holes (NPTH) Tolerance

±0.05 mm (±2 mil)

±0.025 mm (±1 mil)

 

Back-Drilling (Controlled Depth)

Supported

Depth tolerance ±0.15 mm (±6 mil)

For Stub Elimination in high-speed designs.

4.0 Circuit & Imaging (LDI)

Parameter

Standard Capability

Advanced Capability

Notes

Min. Trace/Space (Inner Layer)

0.075 mm / 0.075 mm (3/3 mil)

0.050 mm / 0.050 mm (2/2 mil)

For 1 oz base copper.

Min. Trace/Space (Outer Layer)

0.10 mm / 0.10 mm (4/4 mil)

0.075 mm / 0.075 mm (3/3 mil)

For 1 oz base copper.

Min. Annular Ring (PTH)

0.10 mm (4 mil)

0.075 mm (3 mil)

 

Min. Annular Ring (NPTH)

0.10 mm (4 mil)

0.10 mm (4 mil)

 

Copper Plating Thickness (Finished Hole)

≥ 20 µm (0.8 mil)

25 - 35 µm (1.0 - 1.4 mil)

IPC-6012 Class 2 standard.

Solder Mask Dam (Between Pads)

0.075 mm (3 mil)

0.050 mm (2 mil)

For LPI Solder Mask.

5.0 Surface Finishes (RoHS Compliant)

Finish Type

Standard Thickness / Specification

Key Characteristics & Applications

HASL (Lead-Free)

1 - 40 µm (variable), Flatness per IPC

Economical, robust, good for general purpose. Thermal shock concern for fine-pitch.

ENIG

Ni: 3-5 µm / Au: 0.05-0.15 µm

Flat surface, excellent for fine-pitch BGA, wire bonding, switch contacts.

Immersion Tin

0.8 - 1.5 µm

Excellent solderability, flat, good for press-fit. Limited shelf life.

Immersion Silver

0.1 - 0.4 µm

Excellent solderability, flat, good for high-frequency. Requires anti-tarnish packaging.

OSP (Type 3)

0.2 - 0.5 µm

Low cost, flat, simple process. For quick-turn and single reflow. Limited shelf life.

Electrolytic Hard Gold (Selective)

Au: 0.5 - 2.5 µm (20-100 µin), Ni undercoat: 3-5 µm

Extreme wear resistance for edge connectors, keypads, test points.

ENEPIG

Ni: 3-5 µm / Pd: 0.05-0.2 µm / Au: 0.03-0.05 µm

Superior for multiple reflows and gold/ aluminum wire bonding.

6.0 Solder Mask & Legend

Parameter

Standard Capability

Notes

Type

Liquid Photo-Imageable (LPI), Both Sides

High Tg, Halogen-Free options available.

Color

Green (Standard), Black, White, Blue, Red, Yellow

Other colors upon request.

Min. Web Width (Solder Mask Dam)

0.075 mm (3 mil)

Between SMD pads.

Solder Mask Registration

±0.075 mm (±3 mil)

Relative to copper features.

Legend/Silkscreen Ink Color

White (Standard), Black, Yellow

Epoxy-based ink.

Legend Line Width

0.10 mm (4 mil) minimum recommended

 

7.0 Electrical & Performance Testing

Test Type

Standard Capability

Advanced / Compliance

Electrical Test (E-Test)

100% Flying Probe or Fixture-Based

Netlist verification, continuity & isolation.

Controlled Impedance

±10% tolerance standard (±7% available)

TDR coupon testing. Requires stack-up review.

High Voltage Test (Hi-Pot)

Up to 1500 VDC

For specific safety requirements.

Insulation Resistance

> 500 MΩ (standard)

Per IPC-TM-650 or customer spec.

Dielectric Withstanding Voltage

As per IPC-6012

 

Current Testing

Custom Load Testing available

For power board validation.

8.0 Quality Assurance & Standards

Aspect

Standard / Capability

Primary Quality Standard

IPC-A-600 (Acceptability), IPC-6012 (Performance)

Standard Inspection Class

Class 2 (General Electronic). Class 3 (High-Reliability) upon request.

Inspection Method

Automated Optical Inspection (AOI), Manual Visual Inspection (MVI).

X-Ray Inspection

2D/3D AXI for BGA, QFN, and internal defect analysis (upon request).

Microsection Analysis

Internal lab for process control and failure analysis (FA).

Solderability Testing

Per IPC-J-STD-003 to ensure finish performance.

MSL (Moisture Sensitivity Level)

Baking and dry packaging per IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033.

Certifications (Typical)

ISO 9001:2015, UL Recognized (E-file), RoHS, REACH compliant.

Rigid Flex PCB Design Engineering Support

Successful rigid-flex manufacturing begins with a design that balances electrical performance, mechanical movement and production feasibility. SENTAK provides Rigid Flex PCB Design review and engineering support before fabrication, helping customers identify potential reliability and manufacturing risks at an early stage.

Our engineers review the interaction between the rigid sections, flexible interconnects, materials, copper patterns, vias, coverlay and mechanical folding requirements. The objective is to develop a board that can be manufactured consistently and perform reliably in its intended application.

Our design support covers:

  • Rigid-flex layer stack-up development
  • Static and dynamic bend-area evaluation
  • Rigid-to-flex transition optimization
  • Copper routing through flexible sections
  • Controlled impedance planning
  • Via and microvia structure review
  • Coverlay and solder mask opening design
  • Stiffener selection and positioning
  • Component placement and assembly review
  • Panelization and manufacturing optimization
  • DFM, DFA and DFT analysis
  • Prototype-to-production preparation

 

Critical Considerations in Rigid Flex PCB Design

 

Reliable rigid-flex PCB design requires careful coordination between electrical performance, mechanical movement and manufacturing capability.

Layer Stack-Up

The stack-up affects board thickness, flexibility, impedance and reliability. Avoid unnecessary layers in the flex section, as excessive copper and dielectric thickness can reduce bending performance.

Bend Area Design

Clearly define whether the flex section is static or dynamic. Keep vias and components away from bend zones, use a suitable bend radius and route traces perpendicular to the bend line.

Rigid-to-Flex Transition

Avoid sharp corners, sudden trace-width changes and vias near the transition area. Smooth routing and sufficient coverlay overlap help reduce stress concentration.

Copper Routing

Use curved traces instead of 90-degree corners. Maintain consistent trace widths and avoid large solid copper areas in active bend zones.

Via Placement

Place vias in rigid or reinforced areas whenever possible. Vias should generally be avoided in sections exposed to repeated bending.

Coverlay and Stiffeners

Coverlay openings must allow for manufacturing tolerances. Stiffeners should support connectors and component areas without ending inside an active bend zone.

Controlled Impedance

For high-speed designs, coordinate the material, stack-up, trace width, spacing and reference planes across both rigid and flexible sections.

Early Rigid Flex PCB Design review helps prevent conductor cracking, delamination, impedance problems and assembly interference.

 

Our Rigid Flex PCB Design Review Process

 

1. Project Requirement Review

We review the board function, mechanical structure, application environment, flex movement and production quantity.

2. File and Stack-Up Analysis

Our engineers evaluate the Gerber data, layer structure, materials, copper thickness, impedance requirements and board dimensions.

3. Bend and Transition Review

Bend lines, bend radius, flex direction, transition areas, stiffeners and conductor routing are checked for mechanical reliability.

4. Manufacturing Review

Trace spacing, holes, microvias, coverlay openings, lamination structures and panel utilization are evaluated against the intended manufacturing process.

5. Assembly Review

Component placement, connector support, soldering access, fiducials, test points and fixture requirements are reviewed.

6. Engineering Feedback

Potential issues and recommended modifications are communicated before fabrication. Manufacturing begins after the design, stack-up and production requirements have been confirmed.

 

Common Rigid Flex PCB Design Problems

 

Common issues identified during engineering review include:

  • Bend radius that is too small for the selected construction
  • Vias located inside an active bend area
  • Traces routed parallel to the bend line
  • Sharp conductor corners
  • Excessive copper coverage in flexible sections
  • Abrupt changes in trace width
  • Insufficient distance between vias and rigid-flex transitions
  • Stiffener edges positioned in bend areas
  • Missing or unclear bend-line drawings
  • Components placed too close to fold locations
  • Inadequate coverlay overlap
  • Inconsistent stack-up information
  • Unsupported high-speed reference paths
  • Flex sections with unnecessary layers or copper thickness

Correcting these issues before production can reduce the risk of conductor cracking, delamination, assembly interference and prototype redesign.Discuss Your Stack-Up

Disclaimer

This capability chart serves as a general guideline. The manufacturability of any specific design is confirmed through our formal DFM review process, which analyzes your actual Gerber data, stack-up, and specifications.

Your Design Deserves Our Discipline.

Partner with a manufacturer where quality is a measurable, managed outcome.

Contact Us

Related Products